Donald Trump, Unshackled and Unhinged – The New York Times
He still has a chance to turn things around, but he’s showing no inclination that he wants to.
Source: Donald Trump, Unshackled and Unhinged - The New York Times
The Times’s Lawyer Responds to Donald Trump – The New York Times
This is the letter David McCraw, vice president and assistant general counsel of The New York Times, wrote in response to a request from Marc E. Kasowitz, Mr. Trump's lawyer, to retract an article that featured two women accusing Mr. Trump of touching them inappropriately years ago, and issue an apology.
Source: The Times’s Lawyer Responds to Donald Trump - The New York Times
Bob Dylan, Master of Change – The New York Times
“I’m a poet, I know it, hope I don’t blow it,” he once sang. He hasn’t.
Trump and the Nuclear Keys – The New York Times
Nuclear launch officers count on the president to have sound judgment. That would not be possible under a President Trump.
Donald D. Hoffman | University of California, Irvine
Source: Donald D. Hoffman | University of California, Irvine
The concept of race lacks scientific support, Harvard professor says | Toronto Star
“Race is a scientifically indefensible concept with no biological basis as applied to humans,” says Harvard anthropology professor Daniel Lieberman.
Source: The concept of race lacks scientific support, Harvard professor says | Toronto Star
‘I’m the Last Thing Standing Between You and the Apocalypse’ – The New York Times
Inside the final weeks of Hillary Clinton’s cautious — and surprisingly risky — campaign.
Source: ‘I’m the Last Thing Standing Between You and the Apocalypse’ - The New York Times
It’s time for science to abandon the term ‘statistically significant’ | Aeon Essays
Source: It’s time for science to abandon the term ‘statistically significant’ | Aeon Essay
Here lies an opportunity to ponder the idea that your and my sense of objects, entities, events and one another is nothing more than a collection of expectations or predictions.
This modest cosmology means that the subject matter of inductive and deductive debates:"What is really going on? What can we really say about it?" has the status of questions about angels dancing upon pin heads.
Perhaps we are talking about utilitarian commonalities across irreducibly private renderings of what is going on, from points of view we call ourselves and one another
This does not mean that the distinction between deductive and inductive is not important, but inductive understandings could be closer to the flowing nature of what is going on than hard-edged deductive syllogisms.
Basic income is coming to Ontario: now what? | Toronto Star
Basic income on its own, however designed, will not be enough to eliminate poverty or achieve the other objectives its proponents are pursuing
Source: Basic income is coming to Ontario: now what? | Toronto Star